The first use case runs, the second doesn’t
What worked in the pilot area can’t be transferred to the next line because it was built too narrowly around a single case.
The question is no longer whether robotics is relevant, but whether it actually delivers on the shop floor.
Many companies are already investing in robotics to address labour shortages, rising costs and competitive pressure. Yet they stay stuck in pilot mode.
The problem? Robotics rarely fails because of the technology. It fails because workflows, responsibilities and skills aren’t sufficiently prepared for day-to-day operations.
What this page is about: physical robotics in production, assembly and intralogistics: robot cells, collaborative systems and driverless transport systems. Not the automation of office workflows.
What worked in the pilot area can’t be transferred to the next line because it was built too narrowly around a single case.
A new variant, a different load carrier size, a changed cycle time: the automation needs a specialist all over again.
Troubleshooting sits with a handful of key people. If one of them is out, the automation goes down with them.
The technology belongs to maintenance, the process to the department, the budget to the project. No one owns responsibility for day-to-day operation.
The technology is in place. The transfer into operations is missing.
DCG closes the gap
We connect technology and operations for measurable impact and lasting value creation.
We look at robotics holistically across technology, organisation and people, and enable companies to implement robotics in a structured way, use it efficiently, and scale it sustainably.
Nine questions, three perspectives, three maturity levels. We work through them with you step by step: from the strategic starting point, through day-to-day operations, to scaling across the whole organisation.
Why is robotics strategically decisive for our organisation right now, and what is our starting point?
Why are we committing to robotics, and what does the strategic target architecture (capabilities, systems, interfaces) we need look like?
Why do we want to rethink our employees’ role alongside robotics, and what underlying view of people does that rest on?
How does our organisation need to be set up, in decision paths, structures and interfaces, to operationalise robotics initiatives quickly and reliably?
How do we control, run and orchestrate our robotics technologies in daily operations, and which processes, standards and governance mechanisms does that require?
How do we need to enable our workforce, redesign roles and define responsibilities so people and robotics work together productively?
What we do to turn successful pilots into a robotics practice that scales sustainably across the whole organisation.
What is the concrete use case on which we pilot, validate and iteratively optimise our robotics technology, and how do we measure success?
What do our employees need in terms of support, communication and experiences so they adopt the new role and actively carry the transformation forward?
For us, people are their own column, not a footnote. Robotics changes roles, task profiles and everyday life on the line. We shape this change together with your team, the works council and the managers on site, not around them.
We connect technology and operations for measurable impact and lasting value creation.
Developing clear business models, prioritised use cases and robust business cases
Building an operating model with governance, roles and end-to-end processes
Structured transition of pilot projects into stable, everyday operation
Building scalable structures and use-case portfolios for sustained use
Enabling the organisation to steer, develop further and scale independently
Robotics connects closely with the other topics in our AI & Solutions area: AI transformation and use-case roadmap, AI governance under the EU AI Act, and digital processes and data analytics.

Jochen Kapp is happy to take the time for a no-obligation initial conversation about your current challenges.